Pro Bono
A share of the capacity is reserved for non-profit organisations with social utility. Pro bono here does not mean a smaller standard package, but the same technical depth as in commercial mandates, applied to the bottleneck that really matters to the organisation.
The entry point is always a free technical starting assessment. It clarifies need, risk and a workable lever; from that a focused, time-limited pro bono plan emerges. Nothing prepared in advance is sold; work happens where the organisation can become more capable, more independent or more robust.
Typical starting points
Pro bono suits non-profit organisations. These can be NGOs, associations, trade unions, foundations, education initiatives, research projects, democracy work, social movements or other civil-society organisations.
What matters is less the legal form than the mission fit: data sovereignty, open systems, independence from proprietary vendors and a responsible handling of sensitive data should suit the organisation.
The selection follows four criteria:
- social lever: the starting assessment clarifies where technical work makes the organisation more capable, more independent or more robust
- technical complexity where specialised help really makes a difference: need, risk and a workable lever are distilled into a focused pro bono plan
- the initiative's commitment to take decisions and carry the outcomes forward: the scope sets out what is done, what is deliberately not done and what a handover-ready outcome looks like
Capacity is limited and allocated transparently. A no can therefore be right even with a good mission, when the technical lever is too small, the starting situation still too unclear or the timing not right.
Outcomes
The outcome is not a stack of consulting, but greater capacity to act. Depending on the mandate, this can mean:
- a clear technical assessment of the situation with risks, priorities and a basis for decisions
- a robust target architecture for an existing or new system
- concrete security and resilience improvements with a transparent prioritisation
- a rescue plan for a stalled project
- documented operational processes, runbooks or infrastructure as code
- a basis for decisions on open source, public code, data handling, lock-in or digital sovereignty
- a handover-ready state that internal teams, partners or a future agency can carry forward
The scope deliberately stays narrow enough so that limited pro bono capacity produces a usable outcome.
Scope of work
The scope of work follows the concrete need. The full breadth of technical capability is brought to bear: security, architecture, scaling, the rescue of stranded projects, operating concepts, automation, data and system sovereignty as well as advice on lock-in and proprietary dependencies.
flowchart TD
accTitle: Course of a pro bono mandate
accDescr: From the free starting assessment follows selection by lever and mission, a focused pro bono plan, time-limited delivery and a handover-ready state.
A["Free starting assessment"] --> B["Selection by lever and mission"]
B --> C["Focused pro bono plan"]
C --> D["Delivery, time-limited"]
D --> E["Handover-ready state"]
Examples, not packages:
- An NGO processes sensitive data and needs a starting assessment of data protection, access, backups and secure operation.
- An association runs a system that has grown over time and become too expensive, too fragile or too dependent on individual people.
- A non-profit initiative wants to scale a digital offering without tying itself permanently to a single vendor, an opaque licensing model or a special-purpose solution that is hard to hand over.
At the end of the starting assessment there is a tailored plan: what matters now, what is deliberately not done, what effort is realistic and what a handover-ready outcome looks like.
Scope boundaries
Pro bono is not permanent free IT support, not a replacement for internal IT, not a free agency service and not licence brokerage. Nor is it a mandate where le dot takes over the organisation's mission, prioritisation or operational responsibility.
What is meant is a focused technical mandate as equals: clarify, decide, stabilise, design, rescue or make handover-ready. The organisation remains the owner of its goals, data, systems and decisions.
When a longer period of operation, a commercial delivery or ongoing support makes sense after the pro bono mandate, that is cleanly separated. Pro bono stays a targeted lever, not a hidden entry into dependence.
Key data
- Model: free or heavily discounted, depending on organisation and scope.
- Entry point: a free technical starting assessment of need, risk and a workable lever.
- Duration: focused, time-limited and designed for handover.
- Format: usually remote, with clear appointments and documented outcomes.
- Selection: social lever, technical complexity, commitment and mission fit.
- Capacity: limited, transparent and not guaranteed.
The entry point is free and without obligation. A short starting assessment clarifies whether and where a pro bono lever makes sense.
Further information
- Public Code, the social value of openness.
- Privacy and Anonymity, technical source and data protection.
- Digital Sovereignty, independence without a large budget.